About
This is an example of a WordPress page, you could edit this to put information about yourself or your site so readers know where you are coming from. You can create as many pages like this one or sub-pages as you like and manage all of your content inside of WordPress.
Dr Janeen DeMarte has very limited experience as a clinical psycologist and probably not qualified to be a star prosecution witness in the Arias trial. People should check fpr anycomplaints registered against her. Has had Doctroata for less than four years. The defense will anialted her on cross examination.
I couldn’t disagree with you more. Alyce LaViolette has no doctorate whatsoever and her evaluation was shown to be subjective and unscientific (her 30+ years of experience means nothing in light of this) and Dr. Samuels showed himself to be so incompetent his years and years of experience means very little. Both of the defense witnesses have been utterly devastated by the prosecution. 30 years of experience means nothing if they cannot show that the job they did of assessment was competent. Dr. Damarte’s four years are far better than the 30 + years of the discredited witnesses for the defense. You might want to check out some of my blog articles where I explain what the research shows about this so-called “experience” More experience does not necessarily mean more competency or superior results. I would take Dr. Damarte over Samuels or Laviolette any day of the week and I bet the jury will too.
Dr. Damarte represents the wave of the future. Mental health professionals who are actually trained to do scientifically competent evaluations. She has far more credibility and is to be congratulated for her accomplishments.